cpoop3的部落格

For ended 20 age now umteen Coaches and National Tennis Federations in circles the world, approved to pull your socks up players the smooth way, beside one-mode automaton resembling standard tennis. Fortunately 2 players survived this clearout and have unbroken the go animate in the service and fire all trial game, Pete Sampras and Roger Federer next to Andy Roddick in a silvery geographic region concerning these two very good players.

Due to that one dimensional learning of lawn tennis by coaches and federations, today each person that faces Roger has the screaming meemies. They have no answers or solutions for the challenges Roger presents. This has awakened all good judge in the global to conversation wonders astir the "all assembly game"! The exceedingly same winter sport that 20/30 old age ago they themselves all but killed with new rules, heavier balls, bigger balls, slower balls etc...and by following correct "tennis gurus" next to impoverished work/development examples or court game understanding. Remember that one and all overturned their backs on the teachings of a wonderful Master of the all judicature grooming the unpaid Harry Hopman "The Fox".

Now posterior to Andy Roddick; all these scientific Coaching trials at meliorative his backhanded or his volleys or his returns are virtuously devising him mislay sureness.... now every person is speaking in the order of Andy Roddick evolving a much all judicature game! Amen! Pete Sampras was axiom that next to his unfit form to all coaches for 15 years!

With Andy Roddick it would be unadvised to experimenter near the middle of his lame at this tine of his business. Those property (weak surround of his activity) will in good health themselves as he grows as a professional, practices and gets smarter, eg. go through and much certainty. Nevertheless the weaker surroundings of his team game will e'er be "weaknesses".

If you all retrieve Stefen Edberg had a "poor forehand" and a not so good forehand volley! The one and the same was for Jimmy Connors with his "poor mid-court low forehand" and "weak serve", or next to Guillermo Villas "no serve" and wishy-washy volleys, or Michael Chang hard to get a "Bigger service" all his line and last, Ivan Lendl difficult to break off beingness a "chicken" or to a cut above his volleys to win Wimbledon (I supposition Lendl should have let Tony Roche firing for him at Wimbledon once needed!...not to comment the psychic debacle in 1989 at Rolland Garros). Yet, these players inside-out out to be terrible champions even yet those weaknesses followed and vexed them throughout their careers.

Then Sergio what's the secret? There is a elemental secret:

Top colloquium players swot to compensate or hide from view their weaknesses the most select they can sometimes even next to ruses! For example, you problably may not recall an Italian recitalist called Corrado Barazzutti, but his comment was to outer shell look-alike a runner up to you, act like a loser, visage miserable, despondent, get downward on himself. He walked near his herald somewhat feathers almost within his hunched shoulders, all in all he was the opposition of Dr. James E. Loehr (famous sports scientist), be positive, I fondness the battle, pumping fists, aggressive, powerful person comprehensive of adreneline caste. But, boy you not bother with a bit and Corrado "Mama mia" Barrazutti took you to the cleaners and you were on the next airplane domicile or to the side by side contest. Corrado was a grave competition and long jumper. He ready-made it to the well turned-out job ATP higher top-level of 7 in the World with more brilliant wins!

Great players revise to comedy on their strengths and foot their games on their strengths and they win the supreme by NOT deviating from what they do best, any that is. That is the secret!

Remember Boris "BOOM BOOM!" Becker? Now interpret if Ion Tiriac or Bobby Brett had told Boris, "Boris, you have a very good 1st service but, you entail to get a a great deal higher per centum of primary serves in".... you get the idea, we would never had gotten to know "BOOM BOOM" Becker and he likely would ne'er had won Wimbledon either!

Now to our adolescent associate Andy Roddick, employment and all over work has interpreted distant from Andy Rodick what were his maximum tools and what I call upon his middle strengths or weapons:

-The laborious aces (he hits a lot smaller number aces now afterwards 4 or 5 eld ago!).

- The risk-taking forcing ordinal work (when he most primitive came onto the scene his 2nd spoon over was a weapon, today it is not!). Remember how Pete Sampras nearly new is 2nd tennis stroke as a weapon!

- The disciplining shots internal the hearing. Today Andy is playing 80% of his rapacious or shielding shots 12 to 15 feet bringing up the rear the baseline! He necessarily runs redundant miles that help yourself to away such required sparkle for added in the lead matches and for a longish court game time period.

What does Roddick stipulation to do? Forget roughly speaking the Coaching and the experts! Go next to his instincts, his force game, his fluent strengths:

- Use his biggest ordnance at all time, be it big prototypical services, big 2nd serves or tennis shot and volley on occasion.

- Stop playing 15 feet astern the baseline! Play 3 to 6 feet from the baseline and get internal the board at all chance he gets and hit the big forehand WINNERS! Never offer up an inch!

- Go to the net and mix the stance shots beside short fades or disguised drop-shots and mix thick volleying next to drop-angled-volleys.

- When attacking go 85% of the contemporary world up the vein use totally few transverse committee approaches.

- Never anxiety roughly speaking the volley, if he gets inside the court, he will get easy ample put distant volleys.

- Return person to the touchstone and euphemism it, he essential get covered the trial on those second serves smash them or go to the net and put some kindhearted of physical phenomenon on the another guys serves (chip & complaint you identify it!).

- From thorn one get ahold of his opponents and clank them next to his abrupt fleshly propulsion and ne'er let go. Like Jimmy Connors use to do with his strokes.

- Take lead of the middle of the tennis assembly and of the match; mentally, really and next to his shots.

Finally, in the expansive slams he has to be competent to do this at all present 3 sets in a row or 5 intercalated if he is move to. He requests to drop-off the magnitude of rounds with womb-to-tomb v set matches to 3 sets.

He besides has to develop the stratum of his self-belief, compression and unspecialised stamina!

Easier aforesaid next done, but I for one, believe that the early man can do it!

For interpretation or ideas going on for this nonfiction satisfy email the playwright
Copyright © 1999-2005 Tenniscruz.com®. All rights silent.